Wellows Review (2026): Features, Pricing, Pros & Cons

Wellows is one of the more ambitious tools in the AI-search visibility space, because it doesn't stop at measurement. Most trackers tell you where your brand shows up in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI answers — Wellows tries to close the gap too, generating the articles and surfacing the outreach contacts you'd need to actually get cited. That's a genuinely different pitch. It's also priced per domain, with no permanent free tier, and full five-engine coverage now sits behind a $297/month plan. This review is the honest version: what Wellows actually does, what it costs in 2026, where it's genuinely strong, where it isn't, and who should look elsewhere.

Disclosure: I build FixAEO, a free-to-start AEO tool that competes with Wellows. So read this knowing that — I'll point out plainly where Wellows beats us, and it does, in a few real places. Every price and fact below was checked against Wellows' own pages on 2026-07-19, not lifted from an older write-up. One thing changed since our earlier coverage: full five-engine tracking now requires the $297 Starter tier, not the $97 Essential tier. If you've seen "$97 for all engines" quoted anywhere, that number is stale.

Wellows' homepage, July 2026 — the pitch is measure-and-act: track citations, then generate content and outreach to earn more.

Key takeaways

• What it is: a measure-and-act platform — it tracks AI citations, then generates the content and outreach to earn more.
• Price: per-domain from $37/mo (ChatGPT-only Lite); $297/mo unlocks all 5 engines; no free tier (7-day trial).
• Engines: 5, tiered (1 on Lite, all 5 at $297+).
• Best for: single-domain teams whose bottleneck is producing content and outreach, not just measuring.
• The catch: no free tier, per-domain pricing adds up, and the vendor publishes nothing about who's behind it.
• Our score: 3.8/5.

The quick verdict

Wellows is a measure-and-act AI-visibility platform: it tracks your citations across up to five answer engines, then generates content and outreach targets to close the gaps it finds. That "do something about it" layer is the real reason to look at Wellows. The catches are cost and clarity: it bills per domain, there's no free tier (just a 7-day trial), the cheapest plan tracks only ChatGPT, and the company publishes nothing about who's behind it.

• Buy it if: you want one tool that both measures AI visibility and produces the content and outreach to fix it, you run a single domain, and a per-domain price in the $97–$497 range is comfortable.
• Skip it if: you want a permanent free tier, you only need measurement (not content generation), you track several domains on a budget, or you want transparency about the vendor before you commit (if a free start is the blocker, FixAEO — ours — is the free-first alternative; more below).
• Our score: 3.8/5 — the capabilities scorecard below breaks down why.

Now the full review.

What is Wellows?

Wellows (wellows.com) is an AI-search visibility platform in the category people call AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) or GEO (Generative Engine Optimization). In plain terms: it measures how often your brand is mentioned, cited, and recommended when tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity answer questions in your space — and then it tries to help you fix the gaps.

The category exists because search is splitting. More buyers now ask ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity for recommendations instead of scrolling Google's ten blue links, and those answers name a handful of brands rather than listing everyone. If you're not one of the named few, you're invisible — and a traditional rankings report won't warn you, because AI answers don't map neatly to positions. Tools like Wellows exist to measure that new surface: are you in the answer, for the questions your buyers actually ask? (If the category itself is new to you, our what is AEO primer is the place to start.)

Wellows' distinguishing quality is that it doesn't stop at the dashboard. Where most trackers hand you a citation gap and wish you luck, Wellows turns that gap into a generated article, flags which existing page to update instead of duplicating, and finds verified outreach contacts to go earn a mention. It's a tracker with a content engine and an outreach engine bolted on — which is exactly its appeal, and exactly why it costs more.

Wellows at a glance

Here's the honest headline about Wellows the company: there isn't one to report. As of 2026-07-19, wellows.com shows no founding year, no headquarters, no funding, and no team — just a "© 2026 Wellows. All rights reserved." footer. That's unusual in this category, where most rivals lead with their seed round or their SEO-community endorsements. It doesn't make Wellows illegitimate, but it does mean you're buying the product on the product's merits alone, with no track record to lean on. I'll flag that again in the cons — it's a real consideration, not a nitpick.

What Wellows does — the full feature set

Citation and mention tracking

The core loop is citation-based. You set the prompts your buyers actually ask, Wellows runs them across your engines on a daily cadence, and reports both implicit and explicit citations plus brand mentions — with full historical data access so you can see the trend, not just today's snapshot. This is the measurement heart of the product, and it's competitive with dedicated trackers.

Built-in AI content generation

This is Wellows' signature, and it's a real differentiator. Wellows includes a built-in AI writing agent (the site calls it "KIVA") that turns the citation gaps it finds into articles and briefs — 2 to 70 pieces per month depending on your tier. Most trackers, FixAEO included, do no content generation at all. If your bottleneck is "I know I'm not cited, but I don't have the hours to write the pages that would fix it," this is the feature you're paying for. I'll be plain: FixAEO does not do this, and Wellows does.

Content Optimization (Beta)

Related, and smart: rather than always spinning up a new article, Wellows flags which existing page to update to close a gap. That's the difference between publishing your fourth thin post on a topic and strengthening the one page that's already halfway there. It's marked Beta, so treat it as emerging rather than battle-tested, but the intent is right.

Wellows' Content Optimization — it finds pages to fix and estimates the citation gain, then its KIVA agent can write the content.

Verified outreach / contact finder

The models assemble their answers largely from third-party pages — reviews, roundups, Reddit threads, industry publications — not your own site. Wellows leans into that with a verified outreach contact finder (unlimited on every plan), surfacing who to email, with verified contacts and ready-to-send templates, to go earn those third-party mentions. Again, this is action tooling FixAEO simply doesn't have.

Brand sentiment and competitive monitoring

Beyond presence, Wellows tracks sentiment — how your brand is described in AI answers, not just how often — and does prompt-level competitive monitoring so you can see which rival owns the airtime you want, per prompt.

Google Search Console integration and strategic calls

Wellows integrates with Google Search Console on every plan, so its insights are grounded in your real first-party query data rather than guessed keywords. It also bundles human strategic calls (1 to 5 per month by tier) — actual consulting time, not just software. That's genuinely rare; most self-serve tools give you a help doc and wish you well.

One honest note on scope: Wellows is broad within AEO (measure → generate → optimize → outreach), but it's not an SEO suite. There's no classic Google rank tracking, no backlink index, no site crawler. It's an answer-engine tool with a content engine attached, and that's the frame to buy it in.

How Wellows collects its data

Wellows runs your prompt set across up to five answer engines with daily monitoring, logs implicit and explicit citations plus brand mentions, tracks sentiment, and grounds the whole thing in your first-party Google Search Console data. The vendor states per-tier caps on "responses analyzed" — 1,200 on Lite up to 150,000 on Pro — but how a single "response" is counted isn't defined on the page, so treat those numbers as vendor-stated volume, not an audited metric.

What Wellows does not disclose is its underlying capture method: whether it reads model APIs or reads what a logged-in user actually sees in the product UI. Those can differ — an API response isn't always identical to the answer a real person gets in ChatGPT or Perplexity. The category splits on this, and I couldn't verify Wellows' method from public pages, so I won't assert one. If that distinction matters for your category, put it to Wellows directly before you buy. (For the record, this is one place FixAEO is explicit: we read what a logged-in user actually sees via real browser sessions for engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, not just a sanitized API.)

Setting up Wellows

Wellows' onboarding follows the standard AEO shape:

1. Add your domain. Pricing and limits are per domain, so this is the unit everything hangs off.
2. Connect Google Search Console so insights are grounded in your real query data.
3. Add your prompts — the buyer questions you want to track (40 on Lite, up to 1,000 on Pro).
4. Choose your engines — but note this is decided by your plan, not freely (see the engine table below).
5. Let daily monitoring run. Wellows populates citations, mentions, sentiment, and competitor position.
6. Act on the gaps — generate content, flag existing pages to optimize, or pull verified outreach contacts. This "act" step is where Wellows differs from a pure tracker, and it's the reason to use it.

The bundled strategic call (1–5/mo by tier) is effectively a guided-setup lever too — you get human time to steer the prompt set and priorities, which softens the learning curve for a non-technical marketer.

Which AI engines Wellows tracks

Here's where the nuance lives, so read carefully. Wellows tracks five answer engines total, but coverage is tiered, not flat — you climb plans to unlock engines, and there are no per-engine add-ons:

Tier	Engines you get
Lite ($37)	1 — ChatGPT only
Essential ($97)	2 — ChatGPT + Google AI Overviews
Starter ($297)	5 — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode
Pro ($497)	5 — same five as Starter

Two things to internalize. First, the cheapest tier that unlocks all five engines is now $297/month (Starter) — this changed; an earlier version of Wellows put the full set on the $97 Essential tier, and that's no longer true. If broad coverage is the point, budget for $297, not $97. Second, Wellows' lineup tops out at five engines — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity. There's no Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, or Microsoft Copilot on any tier.

To Wellows' credit, it does cover Google AI Mode, a distinct surface from AI Overviews that several competitors don't track yet — though only from the $297 tier up. (For the record, FixAEO covers Google AI Mode too, and on its $29 Lite plan.)

Wellows pricing

Pricing is public and clean, but read the per-domain and per-tier fine print. Straight from the source (verified on wellows.com/pricing, 2026-07-19; all prices are per domain, per month):

Plan	Price	Engines	Prompts	Content gen	Responses analyzed	Regions	Strategy calls
Lite	$37/domain/mo	1 (ChatGPT)	40	2/mo	1,200	1	1/mo
Essential (Popular)	$97/domain/mo	2	100	5/mo	6,000	2	2/mo
Starter	$297/domain/mo	5 (all)	400	15/mo	60,000	5	3/mo
Pro	$497/domain/mo	5 (all)	1,000	70/mo	150,000	5	5/mo

Wellows' pricing, July 2026 — per domain, ChatGPT-only on Lite; all five engines start at the $297 Starter tier.

A few honest notes:

• There is no permanent free tier. Every plan includes a 7-day free trial, and nothing more. The "your AI visibility starts free with Wellows" language on the site refers solely to that trial — a 7-day trial is not a free tier.
• Everything is priced per domain. If you run three brands, you're paying three times. That per-domain model is the single biggest cost driver to plan around, especially for agencies.
• Full engine coverage means $297+. The $37 and $97 plans track one and two engines respectively; the five-engine set starts at Starter.
• No annual pricing is shown. Only monthly per-domain prices are confirmable — if you want a yearly discount, ask, because the page doesn't list one.
• No Enterprise / Custom tier is shown. Pro ($497) is the top published plan. There's no advertised path to SSO, security review, or dedicated governance.

Wellows capabilities, scored

The scores above come from verified feature coverage on wellows.com, 2026 category context, and public pricing — not a lab benchmark, and I've shown the rubric so you can argue with it. The shape is clear: Wellows is strongest on the act-on-it layer (content generation, outreach) and on the measurement fundamentals, and weakest on value and transparency — the per-domain price with no free tier, the engines gated to $297, and the total absence of company information are what drag the number down.

Two scores deserve a word. Content generation and outreach (4.5) is Wellows' signature and its most genuine edge — very few AEO tools produce the content and contacts to close the gap. Transparency and maturity (3.0) is the drag: with no founding year, funding, or team disclosed, you're buying on the product alone, with no track record. Value (3.0) reflects the per-domain, no-free-tier, five-engines-at-$297 math, which is a steep ask next to free-first and flat-priced rivals.

Wellows pros

• It doesn't just measure — it acts. Built-in AI content generation (2–70 pieces/mo) plus a verified outreach contact finder mean you can close citation gaps, not just observe them. This is the real reason to choose Wellows.
• Content Optimization (Beta) flags which existing page to update rather than spinning up a duplicate — a genuinely smart touch.
• Daily monitoring with full historical data on citations (implicit and explicit) and mentions.
• Google Search Console integration on every plan, so insights are grounded in real first-party query data.
• Bundled human strategy calls (1–5/mo by tier) — actual consulting time, rare for a self-serve tool.
• Covers Google AI Mode (from the $297 tier) — a surface several rivals miss.
• Brand sentiment and prompt-level competitive monitoring, not just mention counts.
• Unlimited outreach contacts on all plans.

Wellows cons

• No permanent free tier — just a 7-day trial. You can't run an occasional audit or kick the tires long-term without paying.
• Priced per domain — multiple brands multiply the bill fast, which stings agencies and portfolio owners especially.
• Five engines is the ceiling, and full coverage starts at $297 — the $37 plan is ChatGPT-only, and there's no Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, or Copilot on any tier.
• No company transparency — no founding year, HQ, funding, or team disclosed anywhere on the site. You're buying on the product alone.
• No published Enterprise tier — no advertised SSO, security review, or governance path above the $497 Pro plan.
• No annual pricing shown — only monthly per-domain rates are confirmable.
• Capture method undisclosed — Wellows doesn't say whether it reads APIs or real logged-in sessions; ask if it matters to you.

Who Wellows is for — and who should skip it

Solo founders and indie marketers are a mixed fit. If you run one domain and your real problem is producing the content to get cited (not just knowing you're not), Wellows' generation engine is compelling — but the no-free-tier, $97-for-two-engines entry is a hard sell before you've confirmed AI search even moves your numbers. Most solos should validate the opportunity with a free tool first (that's the gap FixAEO fills — disclosure applies) and graduate to Wellows if content production becomes the bottleneck.

Startups and small teams get the most natural value. One domain, a real content need, GSC already connected, and a monthly strategy call to steer priorities — that's a coherent package for a small team that wants measurement and execution in one place. Price the engines you need honestly: two engines at $97, or all five at $297.

Agencies should do the per-domain math carefully. Wellows bills per domain, so a ten-client roster is ten subscriptions — and with no published multi-brand or Enterprise plan, the economics don't obviously scale. The content generation and outreach tooling is attractive for client delivery, but compare hard against tools with flatter multi-brand pricing before you commit a roster. (For context, FixAEO's Enterprise plan covers 10 brands under one account; Wellows' per-domain model is a different shape.)

Enterprises face the clearest gap. There's no published Enterprise tier, no advertised SSO or security review, and no company information for a procurement team to diligence. If you need governance, seats, and a vendor track record, Wellows isn't currently positioned for you — Profound- and AthenaHQ-class tools are the lane there.

Wellows vs the alternatives

Wellows sits in a distinctive spot: it's the AEO tool that also makes content, priced per domain with no free tier. Rough entry pricing, mid-2026 (verify each on the vendor's page; see best AEO tools for the full field):

Tool	Entry price	Free option	Engines (entry tier)	Content gen	Best for
Wellows	$37/domain/mo	trial only	1 (5 at $297)	yes	one-domain teams that want measure + create in one tool
FixAEO (us)	Free + from $29/mo	permanent free scan	6 on Lite (9 on Enterprise)	no	self-serve SMBs & founders
Peec AI	$95/mo	none	3 of 6 (11 at Enterprise)	no	funded marketing teams, BI reporting
Profound	from $99/mo	none	1–3 (10 at Enterprise)	limited	enterprise, demand data
AthenaHQ	~$295/mo	capped free tier	8–9	no	enterprise compliance + BI
Otterly	from $29/mo	trial only	4 core	no	content teams

A quick lane-by-lane read:

• vs FixAEO (us): we're free to start and $29/mo paid, with all 6 mainstream engines on Lite — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode — no per-engine tiering. Where Wellows genuinely beats us: it generates content and finds outreach contacts; we do neither. If closing the gap (not just measuring it) is the job, Wellows does something we don't. Where we pull ahead: a permanent free tier, flat pricing that isn't per-domain, more engines on the entry plan, AI-crawler tracking, and GA4 attribution. Disclosure applies — I build FixAEO.
• vs Peec AI: Peec is more polished and more mature (Series A funded), with a cleaner reporting story, but it's measurement-only — no content generation — and it caps you to three of six engines below Enterprise. Different buyer: Peec for BI-style reporting, Wellows for act-on-it content.
• vs Profound: Profound goes upmarket with deeper demand data and enterprise governance; Wellows is scrappier and content-first. If procurement and scale matter, Profound; if content production matters, Wellows.
• vs AthenaHQ / Otterly: AthenaHQ leans enterprise-compliance (SOC 2, SSO) at a higher floor; Otterly undercuts on price with a pre-publish citation predictor. Neither generates content the way Wellows does.

The honest read: if you specifically want one tool that both measures AI visibility and produces the content and outreach to fix it, Wellows' pitch is unique in this table. If you want to start free, track more engines cheaply, or run several domains without paying per-domain, other tools fit better. See our full Wellows alternatives guide for the wider field.

Wellows vs FixAEO — the honest head-to-head

Since I build FixAEO, here's the straight comparison (disclosure applies):

	Wellows	FixAEO (us)
Entry price	$37/mo per domain (ChatGPT-only); $297 for 5 engines	Free, then $29/mo
Free tier	None (7-day trial)	Yes — 1 Gemini scan/day + 22 free tools
Engines (entry paid)	1 on Lite; 5 at $297+	6 on Lite
Best for	single-domain teams wanting content gen + outreach	self-serve SMBs & founders
Standout	content generation + verified-contact outreach	free start, real-browser + geo-aware capture, MCP server

Wellows wins on the act-on-it layer — it generates content and outreach targets that FixAEO doesn't. FixAEO wins on a free start, flat (non-per-domain) pricing, and more engines for less. If producing content in-app is the job, Wellows is differentiated; if you want to start free and measure broadly, we fit better. See our Wellows alternatives for the wider field.

If you'd rather start free (disclosure: that's us)

I'll be straight, since I flagged it up top: FixAEO is our tool, so weigh this accordingly. But if the thing keeping you off Wellows is the no-free-tier, per-domain price, that gap is exactly what we built for. FixAEO runs a free scan — no signup, about 60 seconds — so you can find out whether AI search even moves the needle for your brand before you pay anyone. Paid Lite is $29/mo ($25 annual) and includes all 6 mainstream engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode — with no per-engine tiering and no per-domain multiplier, plus Google Search Console integration and GA4 attribution just like Wellows. Need more room? Growth is $79/mo ($68 annual) with daily rescans, 5 brands, and 50 tracked prompts.

But here's the honest boundary, and it's the whole reason to consider Wellows over us: Wellows generates content and finds outreach contacts, and FixAEO does neither. We measure — brand mentions, sentiment, competitor leaderboards, citation/source analysis, which AI crawlers hit your site, real browser sessions on residential IPs with location-aware tracking by region, a Chrome extension, and an MCP server to query your data from Claude or Cursor (MCP isn't unique to us — Peec and others have one too). We do not write your articles or build your link-outreach list. If that "act on it" layer is what you need, Wellows offers something real that we don't, and I won't pretend otherwise. If a free start and flat pricing matter more, run a free scan and judge for yourself.

Do you need Wellows' content engine, or just visibility tracking?

Fair question before you commit to a per-domain plan. Wellows bundles two jobs — measuring AI visibility and producing content and outreach to improve it — and you pay for both whether or not you use both. If your bottleneck is genuinely production ("I know I'm not cited, and I don't have the hours to write the pages that would fix it"), the content engine earns its price and there's little else like it. But if you already have a content team, or you just want to watch your AI visibility and steer your own roadmap, you're paying for a generation engine you won't run — and a lighter, cheaper, or free-first measurement tool covers that core job (are we in the answer, for the questions our buyers ask) for far less. The honest distinction isn't quality; it's fit. Pay for the content engine if you'll use it. Don't if you won't. That's true of Wellows and, honestly, of us — it's the category, not the vendor.

Is Wellows worth it? The verdict

Buy it if you run a single domain, your real problem is producing the content and outreach to get cited (not just knowing you're not), and a per-domain price in the $97–$497 range is comfortable. The content generation, the Content Optimization beta, the verified contact finder, and the bundled strategy calls are a genuinely differentiated package — that's why my score is a respectable 3.8/5 despite the gaps.

Skip it if you want a permanent free tier, you only need measurement, you track several domains on a budget (the per-domain model adds up fast), you need Enterprise governance, or the total absence of company information gives you pause. Those are real gaps for a lot of buyers, not nitpicks.

Wellows is an ambitious, act-on-it AEO tool whose main catches are accessibility and transparency: per-domain pricing with no free tier, full engine coverage gated to $297, and a vendor that tells you nothing about itself. For a one-domain team with a content bottleneck, it's a real recommendation. For everyone else, start with a free-first tool to confirm the opportunity, and move up to Wellows if and when content production — not measurement — becomes the thing you're missing.

How I researched this

No sponsorship, no affiliate link. I verified Wellows' features, engine list, and pricing against its own pages (homepage and pricing) on 2026-07-19, reading the live rendered pages directly. Where a fact isn't on Wellows' site — the company's founding year, HQ, funding, team, any annual pricing, any Enterprise tier, and its exact data-capture method — I've said so rather than invent it. The "responses analyzed" caps are vendor-stated numbers; how a response is counted isn't defined on the page, so I've flagged them as such. And I build a competing tool, which is disclosed above.

FAQ

What is Wellows?

Wellows is an AI-search visibility (AEO/GEO) platform that both measures and acts. It tracks how often your brand is cited and mentioned across up to five answer engines — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity — then generates content, flags pages to optimize, and finds verified outreach contacts to help close the gaps. It integrates with Google Search Console and includes monthly strategy calls.

How much does Wellows cost?

Four tiers, all priced per domain per month, verified on wellows.com/pricing on 2026-07-19: Lite $37 (1 engine, 40 prompts), Essential $97 (2 engines, 100 prompts), Starter $297 (all 5 engines, 400 prompts), and Pro $497 (all 5 engines, 1,000 prompts). No annual pricing and no Enterprise tier are shown.

Does Wellows have a free plan?

No. There's no permanent free tier — only a 7-day free trial on every plan. The "starts free" language on the site refers to that trial. If a free start is what you need, free-first tools like FixAEO (our tool — one free scan, no signup) fill that gap.

How many AI engines does Wellows track?

Five total: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity. But coverage is tiered — Lite ($37) tracks ChatGPT only, Essential ($97) adds AI Overviews (two engines), and all five require the Starter tier at $297/month or above. There's no Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, or Copilot on any tier.

Did Wellows change its engine pricing?

Yes. Full five-engine coverage now requires the $297 Starter tier. An earlier version put the full engine set on the cheaper $97 Essential tier, so if you've seen that quoted, it's outdated. As of 2026-07-19, Essential ($97) tracks only ChatGPT plus Google AI Overviews.

Does Wellows generate content?

Yes — this is its signature feature. Wellows includes a built-in AI writing agent that produces articles and briefs to close citation gaps, from 2 pieces/month on Lite up to 70/month on Pro. It also has a Content Optimization (Beta) feature that flags which existing page to update instead of duplicating. Most trackers, including FixAEO, don't generate content at all.

Does Wellows integrate with Google Search Console?

Yes, on every plan. Wellows grounds its insights in your real first-party GSC query data rather than guessed keywords. (For the record, FixAEO also integrates with Google Search Console, on its Lite plan and up.)

Is Wellows worth it?

For a one-domain team whose real bottleneck is producing content and outreach to get cited, yes — the generation engine, content optimization, verified contact finder, and bundled strategy calls are genuinely differentiated, and we scored it 3.8/5. For teams that only need measurement, want a free tier, or run several domains on a budget, the per-domain price and no-free-tier make it hard to justify over a free-first alternative.

Who is behind Wellows?

Unknown from public information. As of 2026-07-19, wellows.com discloses no founding year, headquarters, funding, or team — only a "© 2026 Wellows" footer. That doesn't make it illegitimate, but it means you're buying on the product's merits with no vendor track record to diligence, which matters most for enterprise procurement.

What are the best Wellows alternatives?

Depends on the lane: FixAEO (free to start, 6 engines on Lite at $29/mo, flat not per-domain), Peec AI (polished, funded, BI reporting), Otterly (cheaper, citation predictor), and Profound or AthenaHQ (enterprise). See our full Wellows alternatives comparison for the head-to-heads.

Wellows vs FixAEO — which should I pick?

Different jobs. Wellows both measures AI visibility and generates content and outreach to fix it — priced per domain, with no free tier and engines gated by plan. FixAEO (ours) is free to start, $29/mo paid, flat-priced, with all 6 mainstream engines on Lite, GSC integration, GA4 attribution, AI-crawler tracking, and an MCP server — but it does not generate content or do outreach. Pick Wellows if you need the content-production layer; pick FixAEO to start free, track more engines cheaply, and skip the per-domain math.

Does Wellows track Google AI Mode?

Yes — Google AI Mode is one of Wellows' five engines, a distinct surface from AI Overviews that not every competitor tracks. The catch is that it's only available from the $297 Starter tier up; the $37 and $97 plans don't include it. (FixAEO covers Google AI Mode too, on its $29 Lite plan.)

Does Wellows have an MCP server?

Not that we could confirm. There's no mention of an MCP server anywhere on wellows.com as of 2026-07-19, so treat it as unconfirmed. If MCP access matters to you, ask Wellows directly. (For context, FixAEO, Peec, Profound, and Otterly all offer one — MCP isn't unique to any of them.)

Is Wellows legit and safe to use?

The product is real, with public pricing and a working 7-day trial — nothing about signing up is unusual for a SaaS tool. The honest caveat isn't safety; it's transparency: the site publishes no company, funding, or team information, so there's no vendor track record to check. That's worth knowing before you commit, especially at the higher per-domain tiers.